The Transparency of the Peer-Review System of Grant Applications.

Journal of Oral Research - Chile
doi 10.17126/joralres.2018.10
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Dentistry
Date
Authors
Publisher

Facultad de Odontologia, Universidad de Concepcion

Related search

Improving the Peer-Review Process for Grant Applications: Reliability, Validity, Bias, and Generalizability.

American Psychologist
MedicinePsychology
2008English

Evaluating Grant Peer Review in the Health Sciences: A Review of the Literature

2009English

Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals With Discordant Reviews

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2011English

Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology
ArtsPsychologyHumanities
2012English

Laughter and the Chair: Social Pressures Influencing Scoring During Grant Peer Review Meetings

Journal of General Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine
2019English

The Moderating Roles of Follower Conscientiousness and Agreeableness on the Relationship Between Peer Transparency and Follower Transparency

Journal of Business Ethics
ArtsManagementBusinessHumanitiesEconomicsInternational ManagementAccountingLawEconometrics
2017English

Peer Review of Peer Review?

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
1990English

DISCUSSION of “Editorial—The Peer-Review System: Prospects and Challenges”

Hydrological Sciences Journal
Water ScienceTechnology
2006English

Statistical Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Peer Review System

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2008English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy