Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 3: Geotaxis Responses (Mean ± 95% Confidence Intervals) ofD. Melanogasterflies Reared With Spiders in the Experimental Group and Without Spiders in the Control Group.
doi 10.7717/peerj.2314/fig-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 3: Mean (±95% Confidence Intervals) of Landscape Metrics in Relation to Relevé Clusters.
Supplemental Information 3: Fig. S3. Bayesian Estimates (With 95% Confidence Intervals) of the Carrying Capacity in a Typical Year With No Oil and Gas by Working Group.
Figure S6: The Shaded Intervals Represent the 80%, 95%, and 99% Confidence Intervals of the Effect of Mean Current Velocity (Northward/Summer) (M/S) on the Probability ofLeptoserisoccurrence
Figure 3: Admission Hours Before Procedures and Procedure Fee (B) in NIV Group and the Control Group.
Confidence Intervals of Effect Size in Randomized Comparative Parallel-Group Studies
Statistics in Medicine
Epidemiology
Statistics
Probability
Figure 3: PLS-DA Score Plot Comparing Control Group and Overweight Group.
Confidence Intervals for a Mean
Figure A1: Simulated Biomass From the Un-Fished Model (Black Line) With 95% Confidence Intervals Based on 20% CVs (Coefficient of Variation) Shaded Orange by Species Group.
Figure 2: Activity Densities (Mean ± 95% CI) of Carabid Beetles (A), Staphylinid Beetles (B) and Spiders (C) for the Four Different Pitfall Trap Types.
