Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 2: Activity Densities (Mean ± 95% CI) of Carabid Beetles (A), Staphylinid Beetles (B) and Spiders (C) for the Four Different Pitfall Trap Types.
doi 10.7717/peerj.5078/fig-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Supplemental Information 1: Activity Densities of Staphylinid Beetles and Spiders.
Figure 3: Carabid Beetle Species Richness (A) and Community Weighted Mean Body Size Within the Carabid Assemblages (B) for the Four Different Pitfall Trap Types.
The Staphylinid Beetles of the Cayman Islands
Proceedings of the United States National Museum
Table 2: Percent (%) Variance Accounted for (95% CI) Using Different Types of Models.
Figure 1: The Four Different Trap Modifications: Sinker (A), Mesh (B), Assist (C), String (D).
Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and Habitat Fragmentation: A Review
European Journal of Entomology
Insect Science
Figure 5: Mean Value of the (A) Specificity and (B) NPV With Corresponding 95% CI on Different Datasets With Different Number of Historical Hospitalization Records.
Figure 8: The Mean (±95% CI) Retention Potential for the Deer and Raccoon Pelts.
Assemblages of Carabid Beetles (Col. Carabidae) and Ground-Dwelling Spiders (Araneae) in Natural and Artificial Regeneration of Pine Forests
Community Ecology
Evolution
Ecology
Systematics
Behavior
