How Do Authors of Systematic Reviews Deal With Research Malpractice and Misconduct in Original Studies? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Survey of Their Authors

BMJ Open - United Kingdom
doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010442
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Predictors of Citations of Systematic Reviews in Oral Implantology: A Cross-Sectional Bibliometric Analysis

SAGE Open
ArtsSocial SciencesHumanities
2019English

The Scatter of Research: Cross Sectional Comparison of Randomised Trials and Systematic Reviews Across Specialties

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2012English

Systematic Reviews and Research Waste

The Lancet
Medicine
2016English

How to Avoid Bias in Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies

Revista CEFAC
2017English

Authors of Articles, Letters, and Reviews

Transportation Science
CivilTransportationStructural Engineering
1969English

Sex/Gender Reporting and Analysis in Campbell and Cochrane Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Methods Study

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2018English

Systematic Reviews in Educational Research

2020English

Clinical Trials Registries Are Under-Utilized in the Conduct of Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2014English

Systematic Literature Reviews and Undergraduate Research

ACM Inroads
EducationComputer Science
2012English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy