Prospective Registration, Bias Risk and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomised Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Empirical Methodological Study

BMJ Open - United Kingdom
doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002968
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review

Journal of Investigative Dermatology
BiochemistryDermatologyCell BiologyMolecular Biology
2012English

Empirical Evidence for Outcome Reporting Bias in Randomized Clinical Trials of Acupuncture: Comparison of Registered Records and Subsequent Publications

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2015English

The Impact of Outcome Reporting Bias in Randomised Controlled Trials on a Cohort of Systematic Reviews

BMJ
2010English

Outcome Reporting From Clinical Trials of Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Traditional Chinese Medicine or Western Medicine: A Systematic Review

BMJ Open
Medicine
2019English

Computing Threshold Antibody Levels of Protection in Vaccine Clinical Trials: An Assessment of Methodological Bias

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2018English

Table 3: Risk of Bias Assessment (N = 24 Trials) (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomised Trials (Higgins Et Al. 2011)).

English

Registration, Results Reporting, and Publication Bias of Clinical Trials Supporting FDA Approval of Neuropsychiatric Drugs Before and After FDAAA: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2018English

The Methodological Quality Assessment of Current Traditional Chinese Medicine’s Clinical Trials

2019English

Reporting Bias in Trials of Volume Resuscitation With Hydroxyethyl Starch

Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Medicine
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy