The Impact of Outcome Reporting Bias in Randomised Controlled Trials on a Cohort of Systematic Reviews

BMJ
doi 10.1136/bmj.c365
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review

Journal of Investigative Dermatology
BiochemistryDermatologyCell BiologyMolecular Biology
2012English

Reporting Attrition in Randomised Controlled Trials

BMJ
2006English

Variation in Hyperemesis Gravidarum Definition and Outcome Reporting in Randomised Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2018English

The Use of Systematic Reviews in the Planning, Design and Conduct of Randomised Trials: A Retrospective Cohort of NIHR HTA Funded Trials

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2013English

Prospective Registration, Bias Risk and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomised Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Empirical Methodological Study

BMJ Open
Medicine
2013English

Cluster Randomised Trials in Cochrane Reviews: Evaluation of Methodological and Reporting Practice

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Completeness of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials Including People With Transient Ischaemic Attack or Stroke: A Systematic Review

European Stroke Journal
NeurologyCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2018English

The Strong Focus on Positive Results in Abstracts May Cause Bias in Systematic Reviews: A Case Study on Abstract Reporting Bias

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2019English

The Quality of Reporting of Pilot and Feasibility Cluster Randomised Trials: A Systematic Review

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2015English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy