Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

The Myth of Double-Blind Review Revisited: ACL vs. EMNLP

doi 10.18653/v1/d19-1236
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

January 1, 2019

Authors
Cornelia CarageaAna UbanLiviu P. Dinu
Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics


Related search

Announcement: Double-Blind Peer Review

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology
Structural BiologyMolecular Biology
2015English

Double Blind Peer-Review in Humanities

Humanities
2015English

SETAC Journals Adopt Double-Blind Peer Review

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
DevelopmentMedicinePlanningEnvironmental ScienceGeography
2018English

The Myth of a Color-Blind Constitution

SSRN Electronic Journal
1998English

SETAC Journals Adopt Double-Blind Peer Review

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
MutagenesisEnvironmental ChemistryHealthToxicology
2018English

Risperidone vs Olanzapine in Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Double Blind Clinical Trial

MOJ Addiction Medicine & Therapy
2018English

Security of Blind Signatures Revisited

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2012English

Propranolol vs Flunarizine vs Flunarizine Plus Propranolol in Migraine Without Aura Prophylaxis. A Double-Blind Trial

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
Biological PsychiatryNeurology
1997English

The Double Blind Method

Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal
1976English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy