Effect of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome on Bystander Willingness to Perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)–Is Compression–Only Preferred to Standard CPR?

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine- United Kingdom

doi 10.1017/s1049023x00004957

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Authors

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Related search

Chest-Compression-Only Versus Standard CPR

The Lancet
Medicine
2011English

Compression-Only CPR or Standard CPR in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

New England Journal of Medicine
Medicine
2010English

The Effect of Telephone Advice on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on the Rate of Bystander CPR in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Arrest in a Typical Urban Area

Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine
Emergency Medicine
2016English

Comparison of CPR Quality and Rescuer Fatigue Between Standard 30:2 CPR and Chest Compression-Only CPR: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Critical CareEmergency MedicineIntensive Care Medicine
2014English

Usefulness of a Stool to Stabilize Dental Chairs for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)

BMC Emergency Medicine
Emergency Medicine
2019English

Evaluation of Skills in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Using Microsoft Kinect

Journal of Mechanics Engineering and Automation
2018English

Factors Associated With Quality of Bystander CPR: The Presence of Multiple Rescuers and Bystander-Initiated CPR Without Instruction

Resuscitation
Emergency NursingEmergency MedicineCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2014English

Motion Detection Technology as a Tool for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Quality Improvement

Resuscitation
Emergency NursingEmergency MedicineCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2012English

Advocacy for Resuscitation: Any CPR Is Better Than No CPR. An Interview With Dr Axel Siu

2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy