(PDF) Figure 5: (A) Quantitative Similarity Cluster, Using

Figure 5: (A) Quantitative Similarity Cluster, Using Bray–Curtis, of Arthropod Species/Morphospecies by Sampling Sites Across an Altitudinal Ecoregional Zonation. Altitude of the Sampling Site Between Parentheses. (B) Elevational Distribution of the Sorensen Dissimilarity Index Between Paired Assemblages Displaying a Hump-Shaped Pattern (Second-Degree Polynomial Regression).

doi 10.7717/peerj.4117/fig-5

Full Text

Open PDF

Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Table 3: Bray–Curtis Similarities (White Part) and Complementarities Percentage (Grey Part) of Arthropod Assemblages Between Ecoregions and Ecotonal Zones Across an Altitudinal Ecoregional Zonation in Salta Province, Argentina.

English

Figure 5: Similarity of Trap Catches (Bray–-Curtis Similarity Coefficient) Against the Distance Between Each Trap Combinations.

English

Figure 2: Bray–Curtis Dissimilarity Measure for Visit 1 and Visit 2 by Body Site.

English

Identification of the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index: Comment on Yoshioka (2008)

Marine Ecology - Progress Series

English

Figure 6: Relationship Between Troglobitic Community Dissimilarity (Bray–Curtis Distance) and Geographic Distance Resistance Distance.

English

Figure S3: Dendrogram Based on a Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity of Dinoflagellate Communities Along the Songhua River

English

Table 4: Summary of Similarity Percentage Analysis (SIMPER) Listing Species That Cumulatively Contribute 90% to the Dissimilarity (Bray Curtis) of the Two Underwater Visual Sampling Methods Based on Square-Root Transformed Density Data.

English

Figure 2: Distribution of the Samples Determined Through Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling Using Bray–Curtis (A) and Jaccard (B) Matrixes.

English

Figure 4: Dendrogram for the Hierarchical Clustering of the 40 Rabbitfish Individuals (4 Species × 10 Individuals) Based on the Similarity of Food Items (Group-Average Linkage Method Using the Bray–Curtis Similarity Index).

English

Amanote Research

doi 10.7717/peerj.4117/fig-5

Full Text

Abstract

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

Table 3: Bray–Curtis Similarities (White Part) and Complementarities Percentage (Grey Part) of Arthropod Assemblages Between Ecoregions and Ecotonal Zones Across an Altitudinal Ecoregional Zonation in Salta Province, Argentina.

Figure 5: Similarity of Trap Catches (Bray–-Curtis Similarity Coefficient) Against the Distance Between Each Trap Combinations.

Figure 2: Bray–Curtis Dissimilarity Measure for Visit 1 and Visit 2 by Body Site.

Identification of the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index: Comment on Yoshioka (2008)

Figure 6: Relationship Between Troglobitic Community Dissimilarity (Bray–Curtis Distance) and Geographic Distance Resistance Distance.

Figure S3: Dendrogram Based on a Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity of Dinoflagellate Communities Along the Songhua River

Table 4: Summary of Similarity Percentage Analysis (SIMPER) Listing Species That Cumulatively Contribute 90% to the Dissimilarity (Bray Curtis) of the Two Underwater Visual Sampling Methods Based on Square-Root Transformed Density Data.

Figure 2: Distribution of the Samples Determined Through Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling Using Bray–Curtis (A) and Jaccard (B) Matrixes.

Figure 4: Dendrogram for the Hierarchical Clustering of the 40 Rabbitfish Individuals (4 Species × 10 Individuals) Based on the Similarity of Food Items (Group-Average Linkage Method Using the Bray–Curtis Similarity Index).