Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 3: All Significant Differences (P-Values) Between the Studied Sites for the Richness of the Zooplankton Groups (Post-Hoc Multiple Comparisons of Mean Ranks for All Groups).
doi 10.7717/peerj.5087/table-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 4: All Significant Differences (P-Values) Between the Studied Sites for the Abundance of the Zooplankton Groups (Post-Hoc Multiple Comparisons of Mean Ranks for All Groups).
Table S1: Results of Pairwise Comparisons for All Studied Groups of Samples in Alpha-Diversity Measures (Mann–Whitney Pairwise Test)
Table 5: Spearman’s Significant Correlations Between Richness and the Values of Environmental Factors (P < 0.05).
Table 1: Mean Values (Mean ± SE) and Significance Tests of Soil Properties Across All Sites.
Figure 8: Percentage Contribution of Zooplankton Groups in the Mean Total Abundance of Zooplankton at the Sites Examined in the Barycz River.
Table 3: One-Way ANOVA and Tukey’s Test Used for Assessing Statistical Significance of Differences Between Studied Groups Based on ANOVA.
Table S2: Differentially Expressed Proteins in All Treatment Groups
Table 3: Mean Scores for Each Risk Model for Non-Cvd* and CVD Groups in the Sample.
Table 3: Observed and Estimated Species Richness for All Woody Plants >0.5 Cm Dbh.
