Do We All Agree on How to Measure Work Engagement? Factorial Validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a Standard Measurement Tool – A Literature Review

International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health - Germany
doi 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine

Related search

Work Engagement in Serbia: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES)

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2017English

Why Japanese Workers Show Low Work Engagement: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale

BioPsychoSocial Medicine
PsychiatrySocial PsychologyMental HealthPsychologyBiological Psychiatry
2010English

Work Engagement Interventions Can Be Effective: A Systematic Review

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Human Resource ManagementApplied PsychologyOrganizational Behavior
2019English

Live to Work or Love to Work: Work Craving and Work Engagement

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Scale of Work Engagement and Burnout (SWEBO)

Work
MedicineEnvironmentalPublic HealthRehabilitationOccupational Health
2010English

Tool and Work Piece Vibrations Measurement - A Review

Independent Journal of Management & Production
2018English

Passion for Work: Work Engagement Versus Workaholism

English

Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study With Academic Personnel

Applied Research in Quality of Life
Life-course StudiesLife-span
2019English

Construction and Validation of a Psychometric Scale to Measure Academic Engagement

CBU International Conference Proceedings
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy