Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 4: Pairwise FST Comparisons of Geographic Regions Based on SNP (A) and Microsatellite (B) Data.
doi 10.7717/peerj.4077/table-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table S2: Pairwise FST Values
Table 6: Pairwise FST Divergences Between the Analysed Brown Trout Populations Based on Microsatellite (Below Diagonal) and Nuclear PCR-RFLP Data (Above Diagonal) and Their Significance Level.
Table 4: Pairwise FST Values (Below Diagonal) and Geographic Distance (Km) (Above Diagonal) Among Garra Cambodgiensis Population Samples in the Upper Nan River, Thailand.
An Aggregation Function Based on Pairwise Comparisons
International Journal of Scientific and Innovative Mathematical Research
Table 5: Pairwise FST Values for Porites Lobata Sampled From Oahu and Maui.
Table 4: Estimates of Contemporary Migration Rates (M) for Each Populations Based on Microsatellite Data.
Table 1: Pairwise Distance Comparisons for Uncorrectedpand K2P Distance Metrics.
Table S2: Pairwise Comparisons for Effects of Site Within Functional Group
Table 3: Pairwise Values of FST, RST Indexes Between Subpopulations and Number of Effective Migrants Per Generations (Nm).
