Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 3: Comparison Between the COI and 16S Molecular Evolution Rates Estimated in This and Previous Crustacean Studies.
doi 10.7717/peerj.5268/table-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 3: Genetic Distance of Pomacea Specimens Using COI, 16S rDNA and COI + 16S rDNA Aligned Datasets.
Table 4: COI and 16S Primers.
Table 2: Composition of Characters in the COI, 16S rDNA and COI + 16S rDNA Aligned Datasets.
Table 3: Divergences Between the COI Barcode Haplotypes Found in This Study, and One Reference Haplotype From Genbank (5).
Table 3: Comparison Between Phage Therapy and Antibiotic Treatment.
Table 2: A Table Showing the Estimated and Empirical RQI of AceK and Molecular Similars.
Table 5: Modeling Statistics Between the Estimated and the Measured AGB.
Table 2: List of Larvae Analyzed for DNA Regions COI (Top) and 16S rDNA (Bottom) by Station.
Table 5: Results of the Species-Delimitation Analysis (Masters, Fan & Ross, 2011) of the COI-and 16s-Based Consensus Tree.
