Estimation of Cost-Effectiveness in Randomised Controlled Trials When Not All Participants Allocated to Active Intervention Receive It

Trials - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/1745-6215-12-s1-a45
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Differential Dropout and Bias in Randomised Controlled Trials: When It Matters and When It May Not

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2013English

Randomised Controlled Trials

Eye
MedicineArtsSensory SystemsOphthalmologyHumanities
1995English

Response to ‘Randomised Controlled Trials Do Not Always Give the Results We Want but That Doesn’t Mean We Should Abandon Randomised Controlled Trials’

Spinal Cord
MedicineNeurologyRehabilitation
2015English

Health Aid Is Allocated Efficiently, but Not Optimally: Insights From a Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies

Health Affairs
MedicineHealth Policy
2015English

Alternatives to Randomised Controlled Trials for the Poor, the Impatient, and When Evaluating Emerging Technologies

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
SurgeryCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2019English

Randomised Controlled Trials in General Practice

BMJ
1995English

Reporting Attrition in Randomised Controlled Trials

BMJ
2006English

Effectiveness of Training Health Professionals to Provide Smoking Cessation Interventions: Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Quality and Safety in Health Care
1994English

Covariance Modelling for Randomised Controlled Trials

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy