Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 10: Stratigraphic Consistency Metrics for Each of the Four Tree Topologies, Compared With Those of Three Previous Phylogenetic Analyses of Ingroup Phytosaur Relationships.
doi 10.7717/peerj.5901/table-10
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 1: Details of All Previous Cladistic Studies of the Ingroup Relationships of Phytosauria.
Table 4: Consistency Index (CI), Retention Index (RI) and ‘Tree-Lengths’ of the Four Phylogenetic Trees Corresponding to the Four Data Treatments.
Table 3: Sets of Landmark Data Defined for the Phylogenetic Analyses.
Table 8: Mean Bremer Supports Calculated in Five Tree-Regions Within Each of the Four Data Conditions.
Figure 5: Phylogenetic Relationships betweenPhilodendronandHomalomenarecovered by Previous Studies.
Table S1: Specimens Used for the Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses.
Table S5: Phylogenetic Signal at Each Locality
Erratum to : Phage-Host Relationships of Xanthomonas Citri Compared With Those of Other Xanthomonads
Japanese Journal of Phytopathology
Table 3: Predictive Metrics (%) for Each Model Calculated by Logistic Regression.
