Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table S5: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in Juvenile Houston Toad Survival

doi 10.7717/peerj.8480/supp-17
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table S5: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in Juvenile Houston Toad Growth

English

Table 6: List of Cormack–Jolly-Seber Models That Examine Variation in Juvenile Houston Toad Survival.

English

Table 4: List of Competing Models Explaining Variation in Juvenile Houston Toad Growth.

English

Table S1: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in RIFA Counts

English

Table S2: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in Native Ant Counts

English

Table S3: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in Non-Ant Invertebrate Counts

English

Table 5: Top-Ranked Linear Mixed-Effects Model Explaining Variation in Juvenile Houston Toad Growth.

English

File S10: R Code to Examine Variation in Apparent Survival and Recapture Probability of Juvenile Houston Toads (Bufo [=Anaxyrus ] Houstonensis) at the Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge (APCNWR)

English

File S8: R Code to Examine Variation in Growth of Juvenile Houston Toads (Bufo [=Anaxyrus ] Houstonensis) at the Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge (APCNWR)

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy