Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table S1: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in RIFA Counts

doi 10.7717/peerj.8480/supp-13
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table S2: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in Native Ant Counts

English

Table S3: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in Non-Ant Invertebrate Counts

English

Table S5: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in Juvenile Houston Toad Survival

English

Table S5: Comparison of Candidate Models to Examine Variation in Juvenile Houston Toad Growth

English

Table 1: Best-Fit Generalized Linear Model Representing Variation in RIFA Counts.

English

Table S1: Software Comparison

English

Table 6: List of Cormack–Jolly-Seber Models That Examine Variation in Juvenile Houston Toad Survival.

English

Table S1: Table S1

English

Table 2: Summary Statistics for Counts of Putative SNP Loci and Final Counts of Candidate SNPs After Different Filtering Steps.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy