Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure S2: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of Nine Randomly Chosen Proteins. The Selection Model Is WT, the Mutation Model Is Based on the Empirical Flux
doi 10.7717/peerj.5549/supp-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure S1: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of Nine Randomly Chosen Proteins. The Selection Model Is MF, the Mutation Model Is Based on the Empirical Flux
Figure S4: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of 9 Proteins. The Selection Model Is WT, the Mutation Model Is Codon-Based, With Parameters Separately Optimized for Each Protein
Figure S3: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of 9 Proteins. The Selection Model Is MF, the Mutation Model Is Codon-Based, With Parameters Optimized for Each Protein Separately
Figure 3: Each Point Represents the Substitution Rate Versus the Sequence Entropy for All Sites of the Ribonuclease Protein With PDB Code 1pyl, Which Is Representative of Our Data Set and Makes the Figure Easier to Interpret Because of Its Small Number of Sites.
Goodness-Of-Fit Tests for the Functional Linear Model Based on Randomly Projected Empirical Processes
Annals of Statistics
Uncertainty
Statistics
Probability
Table S2: The Details of All the Identified Proteins in the W256 Liver Tumour Model
A Site Specific Model and Analysis of the Neutral Somatic Mutation Rate in Whole-Genome Cancer Data
BMC Bioinformatics
Biochemistry
Applied Mathematics
Computer Science Applications
Structural Biology
Molecular Biology
Figure 2: Effect of the Exchangeability Model on Substitution Rates.
Figure S2: Sensitivity Analysis of the Driver-D Model
