(PDF) Figure 3: Each Point Represents the Substitution Rate

Figure 3: Each Point Represents the Substitution Rate Versus the Sequence Entropy for All Sites of the Ribonuclease Protein With PDB Code 1pyl, Which Is Representative of Our Data Set and Makes the Figure Easier to Interpret Because of Its Small Number of Sites.

doi 10.7717/peerj.5549/fig-3

Full Text

Open PDF

Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 6: Each Point Represents a Set of Protein Sites With Similar Hydrophobicity in the Evolutionary Model.

English

Figure S4: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of 9 Proteins. The Selection Model Is WT, the Mutation Model Is Codon-Based, With Parameters Separately Optimized for Each Protein

English

Figure S3: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of 9 Proteins. The Selection Model Is MF, the Mutation Model Is Codon-Based, With Parameters Optimized for Each Protein Separately

English

Figure S1: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of Nine Randomly Chosen Proteins. The Selection Model Is MF, the Mutation Model Is Based on the Empirical Flux

English

Figure S2: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of Nine Randomly Chosen Proteins. The Selection Model Is WT, the Mutation Model Is Based on the Empirical Flux

English

Figure 2: Maps Showing the Location of Our Study Sites and Experimental Blocks.

English

Figure 6: CCA for All the Recorded Macromycetes in the Four Study Sites.

English

Figure 4: CCA for All the Recorded Macromycetes in the Four Study Sites.

English

Figure 7: nMDS Ordination for the Abundance of All Taxa at Sites in the Barycz System.

English

Amanote Research

Figure 3: Each Point Represents the Substitution Rate Versus the Sequence Entropy for All Sites of the Ribonuclease Protein With PDB Code 1pyl, Which Is Representative of Our Data Set and Makes the Figure Easier to Interpret Because of Its Small Number of Sites.

doi 10.7717/peerj.5549/fig-3

Full Text

Abstract

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

Figure 6: Each Point Represents a Set of Protein Sites With Similar Hydrophobicity in the Evolutionary Model.

Figure S4: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of 9 Proteins. The Selection Model Is WT, the Mutation Model Is Codon-Based, With Parameters Separately Optimized for Each Protein

Figure S3: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of 9 Proteins. The Selection Model Is MF, the Mutation Model Is Codon-Based, With Parameters Optimized for Each Protein Separately

Figure S1: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of Nine Randomly Chosen Proteins. The Selection Model Is MF, the Mutation Model Is Based on the Empirical Flux

Figure S2: Site-Specific Substitution Rate Versus Sequence Entropy for All Sites of Nine Randomly Chosen Proteins. The Selection Model Is WT, the Mutation Model Is Based on the Empirical Flux

Figure 2: Maps Showing the Location of Our Study Sites and Experimental Blocks.

Figure 6: CCA for All the Recorded Macromycetes in the Four Study Sites.

Figure 4: CCA for All the Recorded Macromycetes in the Four Study Sites.

Figure 7: nMDS Ordination for the Abundance of All Taxa at Sites in the Barycz System.