Outcome Choice and Definition in Systematic Reviews Leads to Few Eligible Studies Included in Meta-Analyses: A Case Study

BMC Medical Research Methodology- United Kingdom

doi 10.1186/s12874-020-0898-2

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Authors

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Preclinical Studies: Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Experiments

Laboratory Animals
Animal ScienceZoologyVeterinary
2011English

Recent Meta-Analyses Neglect Previous Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About the Same Topic: A Systematic Examination

BMC Medicine
Medicine
2015English

Nuts and Bolts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Including Network Meta-Analyses

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Sports MedicineRheumatologyOrthopedicsBiomedical Engineering
2019English

A Meta-Epidemiological Study of Subgroup Analyses in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Atrial Fibrillation

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2019English

Over 85% of Included Studies in Systematic Reviews Are on MEDLINE

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2016English

The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2017English

Perineural Dexamethasone – The Dilemma of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

British Journal of Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Carbohydrate Quality and Human Health: A Series of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

The Lancet
Medicine
2019English

An Optimal Search Filter for Retrieving Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2012English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy