Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table S5: Average Relative Abundance of Bacterial Classes

doi 10.7717/peerj.3246/supp-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table 4: Relative Abundance of Predicted Functions.

English

Figure 1: Bacterial Relative Abundance (%) in the Feeds.

English

Table 2: The Relative Abundance (%) of Bacterial Groups That Showed Statistical Significance Based on the LEfSe Method.

English

Figure 1: Relative Abundance of OTUs of Bacterial Communities (Phyla).

English

Figure 5: Relative Macrofaunal Abundance, Biomass and Production Per Size Classes.

English

Figure 2: Relative Abundance of Dominant Bacterial Phyla or Classes Associated With Z2 Larvae Extracted With Four DNA Isolation Kits.

English

Table S5: Average of the Skull Ratio of the Tremarctinae Species Included in This Study

English

Table 3: Percentage, Relative Abundance, and Relative Density of Microsatellites in Downy Mildew Transcripts.

English

Table 6: Mean Relative Abundance (%) ± SD of the Most Prevalent Bacterial Phyla, Classes, Orders, Families, and Genera Found in Fecal Samples of Gilthead Sea Bream Fed With Two Tested Diets.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy