Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 2: The Relative Abundance (%) of Bacterial Groups That Showed Statistical Significance Based on the LEfSe Method.
doi 10.7717/peerj.4446/table-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table S5: Average Relative Abundance of Bacterial Classes
Supplemental Information 2: Relative Abundance of Different Bacterial Groups Identified in the Mare Faecal Microbiota.
Figure S3: The Abundance of 4 Microbial Genera That Showed Significant Abundance Differences Between Species
Figure 1: Bacterial Relative Abundance (%) in the Feeds.
Figure 2: Relative Abundance of Phylum-Level Groups Occurring at a Mean Relative Abundance >2% Across All Filter-Digester Bed Samples.
Table 4: Relative Abundance of Predicted Functions.
Table 2: List of Ten Genotypes From the Hard Winter Wheat Association Mapping Panel (HWWAMP) That Showed Resistance Reaction Against Bacterial Leaf Streak (BLS).
Figure 2: Cladograms of LEfSe Results Showing Bacterial Indicator Taxa at the Phylum Level.
Table 2: Core Bacterial Taxa Shared by threeP. Placomussamples and Their Relative Abundance in Each Sample, as a Percentage of the Total Taxa.
