Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 5: Comparison of the Similarity of Chloroplast Genomes Between Jerusalem Artichoke and Seven Other Species of Crops in the Composite Family.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7596/fig-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 6: Comparison of the Ycf2 Gene Sequence in Chloroplast Genomes Between Jerusalem Artichoke and Seven Other Species of Crops in the Composite Family.
Figure 4: Percent Identity Plot for the Comparison of Eight Composite Chloroplast Genomes.
Supplemental Information 3: The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Jerusalem Artichoke.
Figure 5: DNA Polymorphism of Non-Coding Regions of Chloroplast Genomes of the Five Tordyliinae Species.
Figure 2: Comparison of the Boundaries Between LSC/SSC and IR Regions Among the Eight Ipomoea Chloroplast Genomes.
Figure 4: A MAUVE (Darling Et Al., 2004) Alignment of Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana Chloroplast Genomes Showing the Lack of Rearrangements Between the Chloroplast Genomes of the Two Species.
Comparative Chloroplast Genomes of Camellia Species
PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
Figure 1: ENc-plot of Chloroplast Genomes of Six Euphorbiaceae Plant Species.
Comparison of Fructose Production by 37 Cultivars of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosusL.)
New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science
Horticulture
Agronomy
Crop Science
