GRADE Guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and Other Tools to Assess Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies Should Be Used to Rate the Certainty of a Body of Evidence

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Epidemiology
Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Correction To: A Review of the Techniques Used to Control Confounding Bias and How Spatiotemporal Variation Can Be Controlled in Environmental Impact Studies

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution
Environmental EngineeringEnvironmental ChemistryWater ScienceTechnologyEcological ModelingPollution
2020English

How Should Health Data Be Used?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Legal AspectsEthicsHealthIssuesHealth Policy
2016English

Using the Bayley-Iii to Assess Neurodevelopmental Delay: Which Cut-Off Should Be Used?

Pediatric Research
Child HealthPediatricsPerinatology
2014English

How Should Decision Aids Be Used During Counseling to Help Patients Who Are “Genetically at Risk”?

AMA journal of ethics
Health PolicyEthicsHealthIssuesLegal Aspects
2019English

Risk Compensation Theory Should Be Subject to Systematic Reviews of the Scientific Evidence

Injury Prevention
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
2001English

Should FCE Be Used to Identify Validity of Effort?

Work
MedicineEnvironmentalPublic HealthRehabilitationOccupational Health
2011English

Impregnated Central Venous Catheters Should Be Readily Used to Reduce Risk of Bloodstream Infection

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2013English

Tools Used to Assess the Quality of Peer Review Reports: A Methodological Systematic Review

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2019English

The Rationale for Rating Risk of Bias Should Be Fully Reported: Response

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy