Accuracies of Leuconostocphenotypic Identification: A Comparison of API Systems and Conventional Phenotypic Assays

BMC Infectious Diseases - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/1471-2334-7-69
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Evaluation of API Campy in Comparison With Conventional Methods for Identification of Thermophilic Campylobacters.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Microbiology
1995English

Global Coagulation Assays in Hemophilia A: A Comparison to Conventional Assays

Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
2019English

Comparison of API 20E, API Rapid E, and API Rapid NFT for Identification of Members of the Family Vibrionaceae.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Microbiology
1985English

Comparison of Conventional, Nested, and Real-Time PCR Assays for Rapid and Accurate Detection of Vibrio Vulnificus

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Microbiology
2008English

Comparison of an Automated System With Conventional Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

ISRN Microbiology
2012English

Comparison of Open Essence Scent Identification Test Card and Conventional Olfaction Tests

Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan
Otorhinolaryngology
2011English

Phenotypic Assays for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection

Cytometry Part A
Forensic MedicinePathologyHistologyCell Biology
2017English

Comparison of Production Costs and Resource Use for Organic and Conventional Production Systems

American Journal of Agricultural Economics
AgriculturalEconomicsEconometricsBiological Sciences
2011English

Comparison of API 50 CH Strips to Whole-Chromosomal DNA Probes for Identification of Lactobacillus Species

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Microbiology
2005English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy