Comparison of Anticipated and Actual Control Group Outcome in Randomised Trials in Paediatric Oncology Provides Evidence That Non-Randomised Studies Are Biased in Favour of the Novel Treatment

Trials - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/1745-6215-12-s1-a108
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Comparison of Anticipated and Actual Control Group Outcomes in Randomised Trials in Paediatric Oncology Provides Evidence That Historically Controlled Studies Are Biased in Favour of the Novel Treatment

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2014English

The Importance of Randomised vs Non-Randomised Trials – Authors' Reply

The Lancet
Medicine
2019English

Evidence for Non-Random Sampling in Randomised, Controlled Trials by Yuhji Saitoh

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2016English

Statistics Notes: Concealing Treatment Allocation in Randomised Trials

BMJ
2001English

Frailty Measurement and Outcomes in Interventional Studies: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Randomised Control Trials

BMJ Open
Medicine
2017English

Applying the Results of Randomised Control Trials on Asthma

Thorax
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2007English

Prognosis in Myocardial Infarction--The Benefits of Exercise as Seen in Non-Randomised Trials.

British Journal of Sports Medicine
Sports MedicinePhysical TherapySports ScienceSports TherapyOrthopedicsMedicineRehabilitation
1981English

Evaluating Non-Randomised Intervention Studies

Health Technology Assessment
MedicineHealth Policy
2003English

Randomised Controlled Trials and Population-Based Observational Research: Partners in the Evolution of Medical Evidence

British Journal of Cancer
Cancer ResearchOncology
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy