Recall of Thematically Relevant Material by Adolescent Good and Poor Readers as a Function of Written Versus Oral Presentation.

Journal of Educational Psychology - United States
doi 10.1037//0022-0663.69.4.381
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Psychological Association (APA)

Related search

Good and Poor Readers' Recall of Familiar and Unfamiliar Text

Journal of Reading Behavior
1979English

Flexibility in Reading Literature: Differences Between Good and Poor Adolescent Readers

Scientific Study of Literature
2012English

The Cognitive Profiles of Poor Readers/Good Spellers and Good Readers/Poor Spellers in a Consistent Orthography: A Retrospective Analysis

Preschool and Primary Education
2015English

Serial Recall of Poor Readers in Two Presentation Modalities: Combined Effects of Phonological Similarity and Word Length

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
DevelopmentalExperimentalEducational PsychologyCognitive Psychology
1997English

Allocation of Visual Attention in Good and Poor Readers

Perception & Psychophysics
1987English

Errors in Short-Term Memory for Good and Poor Readers

Memory and Cognition
ArtsNeuropsychologyCognitive PsychologyHumanitiesPhysiological PsychologyMedicineExperimental
1987English

Recall of Categorized and Unrelated Lists With Complete Versus Discrete Presentation and Fast Versus Moderate Presentation Rates

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
1984English

Category K: Oral Presentation: Paediatric and Adolescent Gynaecology

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2018English

An Instructional Study: Improving the Inferential Comprehension of Good and Poor Fourth-Grade Readers.

Journal of Educational Psychology
DevelopmentalEducationEducational Psychology
1983English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy