Pcn182 - Cost-Effectiveness Randomized Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair

Value in Health - United Kingdom
doi 10.1016/j.jval.2018.09.265
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Inguinal Hernia

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgery
2008English

Laparoscopic Versus Open Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia

BMJ
1999English

Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair Versus Open Mesh Plug Repair for Bilateral Primary Inguinal Hernia

Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
2020English

A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair and Open Lichtenstein Mesh Repair

The Medical Journal of Cairo University
2019English

Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Repair Versus Open Lichtenstein Repair: A Randomized Control Trial

International Surgery Journal
2017English

Randomized Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Versus Totally Extraperitoneal Approach in Inguinal Hernia Repair

Advances in Surgical Sciences
2018English

A Comparative Study of Open Versus Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

International Surgery Journal
2017English

Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair: Five Year Follow Up

BMJ
2003English

Simultaneous Repair of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia by Lichtenstein Repair.

International Journal of Advanced Research
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy