Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Erratum: “Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods”
Environmental Health Perspectives
- United States
doi 10.1289/ehp.122-a234
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Categories
Mutagenesis
Public Health
Environmental
Health
Toxicology
Occupational Health
Date
September 1, 2014
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
Environmental Health Perspectives
Related search
Methodological Quality (Risk of Bias) Assessment Tools for Primary and Secondary Medical Studies: What Are They and Which Is Better?
Military Medical Research
Medicine
Chapter 5: Assessing Risk of Bias as a Domain of Quality in Medical Test Studies
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine
Classification of “Koresh” Fighting Methods for Studying in Beginners and Criteria for Assessing Their Performance
Human Sport Medicine
Physical Therapy
Sports Therapy
Orthopedics
Sports Medicine
Rehabilitation
Frequency of Well Established Risk Factors in Indian Patients With Breast Cancer
Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research
Assessing Prenatal and Neonatal Gonadal Steroid Exposure for Studies of Human Development: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Endocrinology
Metabolism
Diabetes
Instruments and Methods: A Buoyancy-Stabilized Hot-Point Drill for Glacier Studies
Journal of Glaciology
Earth-Surface Processes
Prospective Registration, Bias Risk and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomised Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Empirical Methodological Study
BMJ Open
Medicine
Usefulness of Two Instruments in Assessing Depression Among Elderly Mexicans in Population Studies and for Primary Care
Salud Publica de Mexico
Environmental
Public Health
Occupational Health
Financial Instruments for Assessing the Insolvency of Industrial Enterprises
Region: systems, economy, management
