Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table 3: The 20 Most Up/Downregulated Contigs in Each Sample Cross-Comparison.

doi 10.7717/peerj.8088/table-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table 1: Statistics for Megahit Contigs, Recruitment to Data-Rich-Contigs, and Relative Abundance of Draft Genome Results for Each Sample.

English

Table 3: The Top 20 Most Highly Expressed miRNAs Unique to a Particular Plant ELN Sample.

English

Table 3: Mean Scores for Each Risk Model for Non-Cvd* and CVD Groups in the Sample.

English

Capturing the Most Wanted Taxa Through Cross-Sample Correlations

ISME Journal
EvolutionEcologySystematicsMicrobiologyBehavior
2016English

Table S3: The Comparison Result Between the Reference Genome and High-Quality Clean Reads of Each Sample

English

Table 1: Number of Different Types of Variants Found in Each Sample.

English

Table S1: Pool Contigs With Annotation

English

Figure 5: Differential Coverage of the Viral Contigs Assembled Using a Combination of the DNA-spiked Sample and the 1 × MDA Sample With Each Individual Read Sets.

English

Supplemental Information 1: Table S1. Summary of the Sequencing Depth for Each Sample.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy