794: Personalized Counseling Regarding Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management at 39 Weeks

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology - United States
doi 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.817
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Should We Offer Elective Induction of Labor to Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks?

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2019English

Early Induction Versus Expectant Management in Term Prom

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
2017English

Induction of Labour; Comparison of Outcome of Planned Induction Versus Expectant Management in Gestational Hypertension Between 36 to 40 Weeks

THE PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL
2017English

A Study of Induction of Labour Versus Expectant Management for Pregnancies Beyond 40 Weeks a Prospective Comparative Randomised Study

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research
2018English

Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Versus Expecting Labour Till 41 Weeks: Randomized Controlled Trial on Class I Obese Egyptian Women, With Mode of Delivery Being a Study Endpoint

Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2019English

Expectant Management of an Abdominal Pregnancy Diagnosed at 18 Weeks: A Case Report

Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal
2018English

The Effects of Labour Induction at 39 Weeks in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
MedicineChild HealthPediatricsPerinatology
2019English

652: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Associated With Non-Medically Indicated Induction of Labor at Term Compared With Expectant Management in Morbidly Obese Women

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2017English

Why Not Induce Everyone at 39 Weeks?

Birth
GynecologyObstetrics
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy