Induction of Labour; Comparison of Outcome of Planned Induction Versus Expectant Management in Gestational Hypertension Between 36 to 40 Weeks

THE PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL
doi 10.17957/tpmj/17.3800
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Independent Medical Trust

Related search

A Study of Induction of Labour Versus Expectant Management for Pregnancies Beyond 40 Weeks a Prospective Comparative Randomised Study

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research
2018English

794: Personalized Counseling Regarding Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management at 39 Weeks

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2019English

Early Induction Versus Expectant Management in Term Prom

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
2017English

When Outcome Is a Balance: Methods to Measure Combined Utility for the Choice Between Induction of Labour and Expectant Management in Mild Risk Pregnancy at Term

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
GynecologyObstetrics
2007English

Induction of Labour in Prolonged Pregnancy and Its Outcome

Medicine Today
2015English

Active Versus Expectant Management for Women in the Third Stage of Labour

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2015English

Induction of Labour.

BMJ
1970English

Induction of Labour.

BMJ
1970English

A Comparative Study of Labour Induction With Intravaginal Misoprostol Verus Intravenous Oxytocin in Premature Rupture of Membranes Beyound 36 Weeks Gestation

International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy