A Study of Induction of Labour Versus Expectant Management for Pregnancies Beyond 40 Weeks a Prospective Comparative Randomised Study

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research
doi 10.18231/2394-2754.2018.0050
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors

Unknown

Publisher

Innovative Publication

Related search

Induction of Labour; Comparison of Outcome of Planned Induction Versus Expectant Management in Gestational Hypertension Between 36 to 40 Weeks

THE PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL
2017English

Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin for Labour Induction in Women With Rupture of Membranes -A Prospective Randomised Study

Annals of International medical and Dental Research
2017English

Comparative Study of Maternal & Fetal Outcome in Pregnancies of Gestational Age 40 Completed Weeks and Beyond

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental sciences
2013English

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Programmed Labour Protocol and Expectant Management of Labour

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology
2017English

794: Personalized Counseling Regarding Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management at 39 Weeks

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2019English

Induction of Labour Using Foley Catheter: Traction Versus Non-Traction Technique, a Randomized Prospective Study

The Journal of Medical Research
2018English

Expectant Versus Active Management in Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes (PROM) - A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital

The New Indian Journal of OBGYN
2019English

Active Versus Expectant Management for Women in the Third Stage of Labour

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2015English

Early Induction Versus Expectant Management in Term Prom

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy