Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 4: Microbiome Relative Abundance Profiles Remain Relatively Stable Over Time Across All Storage Methods Used at the Phylum (A–C) and Genus (D–F) Levels.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8133/fig-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 3: Relative Abundance of Gut Bacteria at the Phylum, Class and Genus Levels at Two Lakes.
Figure 2: Relative Abundance of Phylum-Level Groups Occurring at a Mean Relative Abundance >2% Across All Filter-Digester Bed Samples.
Figure 2: Relative Bacterial Abundance Patterns of Samples at the Phylum (A) and Genus (B) Level Varies Between Children and Storage Technique Used Within Each Child.
Figure 6: Microbiome Profiles Remained Stable Across Stool Regions.
Figure 4: Relative Abundance of Phylum-Level Groups Occurring at >2% in at Least One of the Liquid Effluent Samples.
Figure 4: Rank Abundance Curve for All Stratigraphic Levels.
Figure 4: Relative Abundance of the Dominant Phyla (A) Firmicutes, (B) Ptoteobacteria, (C) Actinobacteria, (D) Fusobacteria) in Different Wintering Periods.
Figure 4: Relative Expression Levels of HpHYP1 in (R) Root, (S) Stem, (L) Leaf, and (F) Flower Used for Normalization Using the Most Stable Reference Genes or a Combination and the Least Stable Genes.
Figure S3: Comparison of Relative Abundance Values of Phylum- Level Taxa Between Seasons
