Figure 3: Relative Abundance of Gut Bacteria at the Phylum, Class and Genus Levels at Two Lakes.

doi 10.7717/peerj.7045/fig-3

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 4: Microbiome Relative Abundance Profiles Remain Relatively Stable Over Time Across All Storage Methods Used at the Phylum (A–C) and Genus (D–F) Levels.

English

Figure 2: Relative Abundance of Phylum-Level Groups Occurring at a Mean Relative Abundance >2% Across All Filter-Digester Bed Samples.

English

Figure 4: Relative Abundance of Phylum-Level Groups Occurring at >2% in at Least One of the Liquid Effluent Samples.

English

Figure 2: Relative Bacterial Abundance Patterns of Samples at the Phylum (A) and Genus (B) Level Varies Between Children and Storage Technique Used Within Each Child.

English

Figure 9: Mean Relative Abundance of OTUs Present in Gut Mucosal Samples Grouped by Genus.

English

Figure 3: Soil Bacterial Communities Under Different Litter Quantities at the Phylum Level (A) and Class Level (B).

English

Figure S3: Comparison of Relative Abundance Values of Phylum- Level Taxa Between Seasons

English

Figure 5: Relative Abundance of Genera Occurring at >2% in at Least One of the Liquid Effluent Samples.

English

Figure 3: Relative Abundance of the 200 Most Highly Expressed Transcripts.

English