Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 2: Relative Bacterial Abundance Patterns of Samples at the Phylum (A) and Genus (B) Level Varies Between Children and Storage Technique Used Within Each Child.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8133/fig-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 2: Relative Abundance of Phylum-Level Groups Occurring at a Mean Relative Abundance >2% Across All Filter-Digester Bed Samples.
Figure 4: Relative Abundance of Phylum-Level Groups Occurring at >2% in at Least One of the Liquid Effluent Samples.
Figure 4: Taxonomic Composition of Soil Samples on Phylum (A) and Genus Level (B).
Supplemental Information 7: Mean Relative Abundance of Bacterial Genera Within Each Individual Child.
Figure 4: Microbiome Relative Abundance Profiles Remain Relatively Stable Over Time Across All Storage Methods Used at the Phylum (A–C) and Genus (D–F) Levels.
Figure 3: Relative Abundance of Gut Bacteria at the Phylum, Class and Genus Levels at Two Lakes.
Figure S3: Comparison of Relative Abundance Values of Phylum- Level Taxa Between Seasons
Figure 3: Soil Bacterial Communities Under Different Litter Quantities at the Phylum Level (A) and Class Level (B).
Figure 2: Cladograms of LEfSe Results Showing Bacterial Indicator Taxa at the Phylum Level.
