Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 2: Particle Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8090/fig-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 3: Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.
Figure 4: Erodibility Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.
Table 2: Tests of the Soil Particle Fractal Dimension, Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension, Erodibility Linkage With Time (Years Since Cropland Abandonment), Rehabilitation Pattern and Soil Depth.
Figure 5: The Differences of Particle Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Figure 6: The Differences of Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Incomplete Fractal Showers and Restoration of Dimension
EPJ Web of Conferences
Astronomy
Physics
Figure 7: The Differences of Erodibility Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Figure 8: Biplot of the First Two RDA Axes Between the Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns, Soil Depth, Restoration Time and Fractal Dimension, Erodibility (K Factor), TC, TOC, TN, Each Classes Particles and Micro-Aggregate.
Recognition of Patterns With Fractal Structure in Time Series
Pattern Recognition and Classification in Time Series Data
