Figure 2: Particle Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns.

doi 10.7717/peerj.8090/fig-2

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 3: Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.

English

Figure 4: Erodibility Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.

English

Table 2: Tests of the Soil Particle Fractal Dimension, Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension, Erodibility Linkage With Time (Years Since Cropland Abandonment), Rehabilitation Pattern and Soil Depth.

English

Figure 5: The Differences of Particle Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.

English

Figure 6: The Differences of Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.

English

Incomplete Fractal Showers and Restoration of Dimension

EPJ Web of Conferences
AstronomyPhysics
2019English

Figure 7: The Differences of Erodibility Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.

English

Figure 8: Biplot of the First Two RDA Axes Between the Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns, Soil Depth, Restoration Time and Fractal Dimension, Erodibility (K Factor), TC, TOC, TN, Each Classes Particles and Micro-Aggregate.

English

Recognition of Patterns With Fractal Structure in Time Series

Pattern Recognition and Classification in Time Series Data
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy