Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 1: The CCR Performance of Different Methods for the CROSS Dataset.
doi 10.7717/peerjcs.206/table-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 2: The CCR Performance of Different Methods for the Lankershim Dataset.
Table 1: Performance Comparisons Between the Proposed Method and State-Of-The-Art Methods Based on the FRGC-v2 Dataset.
Table 3: Comparisons of Performance of the Three Different Regression Methods.
Table 1: Quantitative Results on the MIT Dataset.
Table 1: Metagenomic Study Dataset.
Table 2: The Performance of the Six Methods Under Different Sample Size Setting Rules.
Table 4: Testing Performance of Dataset I.
Figure 1: Vehicle Trajectories in CROSS Dataset.
Table 4: Rank-1 Accuracy (%) in Face Identification for LFW Dataset.
