Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table 2: The CCR Performance of Different Methods for the Lankershim Dataset.

doi 10.7717/peerjcs.206/table-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table 1: The CCR Performance of Different Methods for the CROSS Dataset.

English

Figure 6: Cluster Models: (A) the CROSS Dataset, (B) the Lankershim Dataset.

English

Table 2: The Performance of the Six Methods Under Different Sample Size Setting Rules.

English

Figure 3: Clustering Accuracy of (A) the CROSS Dataset, (B) the Lankershim Dataset.

English

Table 3: Comparisons of Performance of the Three Different Regression Methods.

English

Figure 5: The Impact of Grid Size on the Clustering Accuracy: (A) the CROSS Dataset, (B) the Lankershim Dataset.

English

Table 2: Performance Comparison of OD Segmentation Methods.

English

Table 4: Testing Performance of Dataset I.

English

Table 1: Performance Comparisons Between the Proposed Method and State-Of-The-Art Methods Based on the FRGC-v2 Dataset.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy