Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 1: Comparison of Shape Similarity Between Reconstructions Generated From Complete Magnetic Resonance Imaging Segmentations and Sparse Anatomical Landmarks.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8397/table-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 5: Shape Similarity for Reconstructions Generated From Sparse Anatomical Landmarks.
Figure 3: Anatomical Landmarks Used for Sparse Reconstructions.
Table 1: Fixed Anatomical Landmarks and Descriptions.
Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reliability of Anatomical Landmarks and Reference Lines Used to Assess Pelvic Organ Prolapse
International Urogynecology Journal
Gynecology
Urology
Obstetrics
Figure 7: Best- And Worst-Case Reconstructions Generated From Sparse Anatomical Data in Terms of Absolute Euclidean Distance (Mm).
3D Shape Reasoning for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks
Computer-Aided Design and Applications
Computational Mechanics
Computational Mathematics
Computer Graphics
Computer-Aided Design
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Non-Puerperal Complete Uterine Inversion
Iranian Journal of Radiology
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Imaging
Table 1: Landmarks Used in the Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Human Craniofacial Shape.
Magnetic Resonance Super-Resolution Imaging Measurement With Dictionary-Optimized Sparse Learning
Measurement Science Review
Control
Systems Engineering
Biomedical Engineering
Instrumentation
