Cluster Randomised Trials in Cochrane Reviews: Evaluation of Methodological and Reporting Practice

PLoS ONE - United States
doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0151818
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

The Quality of Reporting in Cluster Randomised Crossover Trials: Proposal for Reporting Items and an Assessment of Reporting Quality

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2016English

The Quality of Reporting of Pilot and Feasibility Cluster Randomised Trials: A Systematic Review

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2015English

Reporting Attrition in Randomised Controlled Trials

BMJ
2006English

Inadequate Reporting of Research Ethics Review and Informed Consent in Cluster Randomised Trials: Review of Random Sample of Published Trials

BMJ
2011English

The Impact of Outcome Reporting Bias in Randomised Controlled Trials on a Cohort of Systematic Reviews

BMJ
2010English

Pharmacotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Cochrane Systematic Review of Randomised Trials

British Journal of Psychiatry
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2010English

Randomised Controlled Trials in General Practice

BMJ
1995English

Randomised Clinical Trials in General Practice.

BMJ
1992English

Prospective Registration, Bias Risk and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomised Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Empirical Methodological Study

BMJ Open
Medicine
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy