(PDF) Figure 7: The Average Length (Bp) of Variable Versus

Figure 7: The Average Length (Bp) of Variable Versus Non-Variable Chloroplast Microsatellites for Both Mono- And Di-Nucleotide Repeat Motif Types Observed in Both (A) Fagus Crenata and (B) F. Engleriana Including the Standard Deviation (Error Bars) and Minimum and Maximum Lengths (Empty Circles).

doi 10.7717/peerj.7026/fig-7

Full Text

Open PDF

Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 6: The Number of Chloroplast Microsatellites of Each Repeat Type Shared in Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana.

English

The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Fagus Crenata (Subgenus Fagus) and Comparison With F. Engleriana (Subgenus Engleriana)

2019

English

Supplemental Information 4: Information on All 46 Observed Chloroplast Microsatellites That Displayed Variation Between Fagus Crenata and Fagus Engleriana.

English

Figure 2: The Best Scoring Maximum Likelihood Phylogenetic Tree Based on 143,882 Bp of Non-Gapped Sequence in a Gblock Alignment of the Whole Chloroplast Genomes of Fagus Crenata, F. Engleriana, Representative Genera of the Fagaceae and Outgroups From Betulaceae, Juglandaceae and Myricaceae.

English

Figure 4: A MAUVE (Darling Et Al., 2004) Alignment of Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana Chloroplast Genomes Showing the Lack of Rearrangements Between the Chloroplast Genomes of the Two Species.

English

Figure 5: Comparative Analysis of the Nucleotide Diversity (Pi) Values Between the 101 Regions (39 Coding Genes, 52 Intergenic Spacers, and 10 Intron Regions) of the Whole Chloroplast Genomes of the Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana.

English

Figure 4: Difference Between the Forecast Error of Models and the Error of the Average Baseline Using Both Absolute Error (A) and Deviance (B).

English

Figure 1: Chloroplast Genome Map of Fagus Crenata.

English

Supplemental Information 4: Average Percentage of the Five Sediment Classes Per Reef (EG, AG, SW) Collected From Both the Sediment Traps (A) and the Benthos (B). Error Bars Represent Standard Errors.

English

Amanote Research

Figure 7: The Average Length (Bp) of Variable Versus Non-Variable Chloroplast Microsatellites for Both Mono- And Di-Nucleotide Repeat Motif Types Observed in Both (A) Fagus Crenata and (B) F. Engleriana Including the Standard Deviation (Error Bars) and Minimum and Maximum Lengths (Empty Circles).

doi 10.7717/peerj.7026/fig-7

Full Text

Abstract

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

Figure 6: The Number of Chloroplast Microsatellites of Each Repeat Type Shared in Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana.

The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Fagus Crenata (Subgenus Fagus) and Comparison With F. Engleriana (Subgenus Engleriana)

Supplemental Information 4: Information on All 46 Observed Chloroplast Microsatellites That Displayed Variation Between Fagus Crenata and Fagus Engleriana.

Figure 2: The Best Scoring Maximum Likelihood Phylogenetic Tree Based on 143,882 Bp of Non-Gapped Sequence in a Gblock Alignment of the Whole Chloroplast Genomes of Fagus Crenata, F. Engleriana, Representative Genera of the Fagaceae and Outgroups From Betulaceae, Juglandaceae and Myricaceae.

Figure 4: A MAUVE (Darling Et Al., 2004) Alignment of Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana Chloroplast Genomes Showing the Lack of Rearrangements Between the Chloroplast Genomes of the Two Species.

Figure 5: Comparative Analysis of the Nucleotide Diversity (Pi) Values Between the 101 Regions (39 Coding Genes, 52 Intergenic Spacers, and 10 Intron Regions) of the Whole Chloroplast Genomes of the Fagus Crenata and F. Engleriana.

Figure 4: Difference Between the Forecast Error of Models and the Error of the Average Baseline Using Both Absolute Error (A) and Deviance (B).

Figure 1: Chloroplast Genome Map of Fagus Crenata.

Supplemental Information 4: Average Percentage of the Five Sediment Classes Per Reef (EG, AG, SW) Collected From Both the Sediment Traps (A) and the Benthos (B). Error Bars Represent Standard Errors.