Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Why Are Women Underused in the JECH Peer Review Process?

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health - United Kingdom
doi 10.1136/jech.57.12.936
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
EpidemiologyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
Date

December 1, 2003

Authors
M del Carmen Davo
Publisher

BMJ


Related search

Why Peer Review?

Communications in Information Literacy
E-learningEducationLibraryInformation Sciences
2009English

Why Write for Peer Review?

Theological Librarianship
2012English

Peer Review Process File 20150101

Journal of Clinical and Translational Research
2015English

Why Are Women Penalized in Product Markets?

Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
2019English

The Value and Process of Peer Review

AORN Journal
Surgical NursingMedical
2018English

Why Art Therapists Should Care About Peer Review

Art Therapy
Clinical PsychologyManual TherapyComplementary
2016English

The Peer Review Process II: To Review and Be Reviewed

International Urogynecology Journal
GynecologyUrologyObstetrics
2011English

Your Role and Responsibilities in the Manuscript Peer Review Process

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
PharmacologyPharmacyMedicineToxicologyEducationPharmaceutics
2008English

An Innovative Faculty Development Process: Peer Review

Journal of Nursing & Healthcare
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy