Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 4: Erodibility Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8090/fig-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 3: Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.
Figure 2: Particle Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns.
Table 2: Tests of the Soil Particle Fractal Dimension, Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension, Erodibility Linkage With Time (Years Since Cropland Abandonment), Rehabilitation Pattern and Soil Depth.
Figure 7: The Differences of Erodibility Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Figure 8: Biplot of the First Two RDA Axes Between the Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns, Soil Depth, Restoration Time and Fractal Dimension, Erodibility (K Factor), TC, TOC, TN, Each Classes Particles and Micro-Aggregate.
Sediment Yield and Seasonal Soil Erodibility for Semiarid Cropland in Western Canada
Canadian Journal of Soil Science
Soil Science
Figure 4: Mean RMDQ Change Scores at Each Time Point, by Group.
Vegetation-Climate Feedbacks Modulate Rainfall Patterns in Africa Under Future Climate Change
Vegetation-Climate Feedbacks Modulate Rainfall Patterns in Africa Under Future Climate Change
