Poor Methodological Quality but Higher Reporting Standards Seen in Systematic Reviews in Radiation Dermatitis

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.1422
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Does Updating Improve the Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews?

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2006English

Identifying Approaches for Assessing Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews: A Descriptive Study

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2017English

Systematic Review Adherence to Methodological or Reporting Quality

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2017English

International Financial Reporting Standards and Financial Reporting Quality in Nigeria

Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana)
2016English

The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2017English

Effectiveness of Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Methodological Quality of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews

Frontiers of Nursing
EducationNursing
2019English

PRISMA Harms Checklist: Improving Harms Reporting in Systematic Reviews

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2016English

Methods of Conduct and Reporting of Living Systematic Reviews: A Protocol for a Living Methodological Survey

F1000Research
GeneticsMolecular BiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryMicrobiology ImmunologyMedicineToxicologyPharmaceutics
2019English

Cluster Randomised Trials in Cochrane Reviews: Evaluation of Methodological and Reporting Practice

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy