The Strong Focus on Positive Results in Abstracts May Cause Bias in Systematic Reviews: A Case Study on Abstract Reporting Bias

Systematic Reviews - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s13643-019-1082-9
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

The Impact of Outcome Reporting Bias in Randomised Controlled Trials on a Cohort of Systematic Reviews

BMJ
2010English

Abstract Analysis Method Facilitates Filtering Low-Methodological Quality and High-Bias Risk Systematic Reviews on Psoriasis Interventions

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2017English

How to Avoid Bias in Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies

Revista CEFAC
2017English

From the Editors’ Desk: Bias in Systematic Reviews—Let the Reader Beware

Journal of General Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine
2017English

Reporting Bias in Medical Research - A Narrative Review

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2010English

316 the Role of Selektion Bias in a Case-Crossover Study on Occupational Injuries

Injury Prevention
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
2016English

Selection Bias Effects on RAISE-ETP Results

American Journal of Psychiatry
PsychiatryMental Health
2016English

Publication Bias in the Anesthesiology Literature: Shifting the Focus From the “Positive” to the “Truth”

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
MedicineAnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2016English

Information Bias in Epidemiological Studies With a Special Focus on Obstetrics and Gynecology

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
MedicineGynecologyObstetrics
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy