Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 1: Results of the Post-Hoc Dunn Test for Inter-Specific Differences in Feather Length (FL) and Feather Growth Rate (FGR) for Each Studied Species.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7807/table-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 2: Spearmans Rank Correlation Output for Correlations Between Feather Growth Rate (FGR) and Feather Length (FL) for Each Studied Species.
Figure 1: Correlation Between Feather Growth Rate (FGR) and Feather Length (FL) for All Four Studied Storm-Petrel Species.
Figure S1: Inter-Annual Differences in Feather Length (FL) and Feather Growth Rate (FGR) for the Southern Storm-Petrel Species.
Table 3: Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Models for Feather Growth Rate (FGR) Based on Feather Length (FL).
Table S2: Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Models for Feather Growth Rate (FGR) Based on Feather Length (FL) Per Feather Type
Figure S2: Relationship Between Daily Feather Growth Rate (FGR) and Feather Length (FL) for Non-Procellariiformes Reported in Literature
Table 6: One-Sample Student’s T-Test Output of the Residuals of Feather Growth Rate (FGR) of Each Studied Species Predicted by the Optimized Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Model.
Table 4: Post Hoc Results for Chi Squared Test of Month-Specific Differences in Risk Behavior.
Table 3: Post Hoc Results for Chi Squared Test of Location-Specific Differences in Risk Behavior.
