The Case-Referent Study: Are Difficulties in Its Reporting and Interpretation Affecting Non-RCT Systematic Reviews? Would an Extension to Strobe Help?

Value in Health - United Kingdom
doi 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.305
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology: Molecular Epidemiology STROBE-ME. An Extension of the STROBE Statement

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
EpidemiologyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2011English

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

PLoS Medicine
BiochemistryBiotechnologyMolecular BiologyCell BiologyMedicine
2007English

PRISMA Harms Checklist: Improving Harms Reporting in Systematic Reviews

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2016English

Interpretation of Subgroup Analyses in Systematic Reviews: A Tutorial

Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
EpidemiologyPublic HealthMicrobiologyEnvironmentalInfectious DiseasesOccupational Health
2019English

The Strong Focus on Positive Results in Abstracts May Cause Bias in Systematic Reviews: A Case Study on Abstract Reporting Bias

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2019English

The Interpretation of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses: An Objective or Subjective Process?

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Health PolicyHealth Informatics
2008English

Sex/Gender Reporting and Analysis in Campbell and Cochrane Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Methods Study

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2018English

Does Updating Improve the Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews?

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2006English

Identifying Approaches for Assessing Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews: A Descriptive Study

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy